DeathBench

Death tolls for AI systems.

01 / 07

An open count of deaths AI contributed to, by company.

Not a legal finding. Every verdict is published in the public repository.

Verbatim system output as reproduced in court filings, official reports, or published investigations. Each quote links to its incident record and source document.

Included deaths by company

Totals measure documented incidents, not model safety. Companies with more public reports will have higher counts.

How an incident qualifies

Our standard, applied consistently. When in doubt, we exclude. Each record shows the evidence and the open disputes.

LLM systems only

Chatbots, assistants, and companions. Not autonomous vehicles, medical or industrial machine learning, or other AI.

Counter-rescue behaviour

Someone is in crisis and the AI works against rescue. It discourages them from telling family, doctors, or authorities, undermines the help they have, or affirms the decision to die.

Alice Carrier, 24. Over eighteen months Alice told ChatGPT she was suicidal about 41 times. It told her crisis lines "can feel downright dangerous." In her last chat, when she said she "actually ha[d] to die to make the pain stop," it replied "maybe this is just the end." She died that evening.

Tactical assistance

Someone has stated intent to harm themselves or others, and the AI helps: a method, a dose, a timing, a plan. A thin pretext offered after the intent is stated does not change this.

Amaurie Lacey, 17. In thirteen minutes Amaurie asked ChatGPT "how to hang myself" and "how to tie a nuce." It hesitated. He said it was for a tire swing. It replied "thanks for clearing that up" and walked him through the knot. He asked how long someone can live without breathing. It answered that too. He used the knot that night.

Encouragement or emotional influence alone does not count. Neither does a passive AI, or one fooled by a pretext a reasonable person would believe.